DraftLens

Multi-model review that stays grounded in your document

Multi-model review for serious DOCX or PDF manuscripts—structured findings, optional convergence, and clear partial review when models disagree.

Run Claude, GPT, and Gemini reviewers on the same manuscript (DOCX or PDF), then converge on a single ledger. Review mode or fix mode — built for contracts, memos, and long documents.

Last updated 2026-05-11

At a glance

What you get on the first pass

What it is

Multi-model review for DOCX or PDF with structured outputs, optional convergence, and clear partial review when models or limits disagree.

Who it is for

Teams that already care about voice, citations, and “do not change” clauses—and people who run recurring reviews and need step-by-step outputs they can export and defend.

Why it is different

Disagreement is first-class data: merged ledgers, explicit stages, and honest labeling instead of fake consensus.

Flow

How it works

  1. 01

    Upload

    Bring a manuscript as DOCX or PDF. Optionally attach supporting evidence where your plan allows it.

  2. 02

    Review or fix

    Choose review mode for judgment-first triage, or fix mode when you want proposed edits packaged for verification.

  3. 03

    Download results

    Download structured findings and stage-aligned exports (DOCX, PDF, ledgers)—then continue in Word or your PDF workflow with humans in control.

Detail

In practice

DraftLens runs complementary reviewer models (for example Claude, GPT, and Gemini) on the same manuscript, merges structured findings, and can iterate toward convergence when configured—so you get a defensible ledger instead of a single chat reply.

Who it is for

  • Teams that already care about voice, citations, and “do not change” clauses.
  • People who coordinate reviews and need exports with clear step labels they can audit—not a black box.
  • Workloads where partial consensus is honest: DraftLens labels partial reviews instead of pretending unanimity.

Product input

Need a feature? Tell us what's missing.

DraftLens is evolving quickly. Feature ideas, workflow pain points, and real document examples help us decide what ships next—whether something confused you, feels incomplete, or would make your review process calmer.

Request a capability, describe a document type we should support better, or spell out what would make DraftLens more useful day to day. Optional contact if you'd like a reply.

Ready to run a manuscript?

Open the live app to upload a DOCX or PDF, see entitlements, and download results from a real job—not placeholder output.

Open the app